The Respect for Marriage Act does not respect any form of marriage. It does not even mention interracial or homosexual marriage, the stated purpose of the bill. Instead of a moral or righteous cause, the Bill only extends the power of the IRS and allows for the political persecution of organizations, institutions, and individuals that defy Leftist ideology.

While Republican pundits and commentators lament the 2022 election results, they ignore the critical application of the 1948 Presidential campaign. The lack of midterm dominance disarmed the Democratic and Biden especially of their preferred ad hominem assaults that blame their political opposition for the inevitable consequences of the doomed economic policies enacted during the first two years of the Biden Presidency. The parallels mirror those of the 1946-1948 cycle between Truman and the so-called "do nothing" 80th Congress dominated by Republicans that saw the election of Truman in 1948 in one of the greatest electoral upsets in American history.

Great Replacement Theory (GRT) is used to malign those who question modern immigration practices, both legal and illegal, as hallmarks of racism and prejudice. Omitted from this conversation is the historical roots of the Democratic Party in perpetuating actual GRT propaganda to uphold slavery and later Jim Crowism and the violent murder of blacks and immigrants seeking employment in Northern industrial cities.

Hidden behind this facade is a very real political strategy employed openly and lauded by every Leftist-Democrat spokesperson and publication, from the Democrat President Joe Biden to Salon magazine as early as the 2000s.

One might ask: Why invite Southern Hispanic illegal immigrants and refugees, while outright rejecting Cubans? The answer is a simple one: the acclimation of political power.

Booth gained infamy for assassinated the Great Emancipator, Abraham Lincoln. Though accurate, this brief summation omits his radicalization through Democrat propaganda, his self-hatred, and desire to elevate himself to the kind of mythologization that followed Old John Brown. Where Brown was the agent of the North and liberty, Boothe personified the Southern slave-holding Confederate Democrats.

Prior to and during the hostilities of the Civil War, Copperhead Democrats used pamphlets and the wide reach of the New York Times and other newspapers to spread their anti-black, racist propaganda. The intent was the same as similar Southern strategies: to foment racial hatred and create social discord for political opportunity.

Catapulted into the headines with the recent Supreme Court decision in Carson v. Makin, the Establishment Clause, or the doctrine of separating the church from the state, remains a misunderstood revision of its historical applications. The Makin decision returned the original understanding of the doctrine, distorted by the secular Klansmen judicial activist, Hugo Black, in 1947. But where did this doctrine originate, and how was it understood before the disastrous Everson decision?

Often used contemporarily as a tool to malign America and the Republican Party, a brief examination reveals Juneteenth to be a positive reflection of both the nation and the party responsible for ending slavery and defeating the despotism of the Democratic Party.

Democrat politicians claim that Republicans being elected would elevate white supremacy and stoke a civil war. These notions are absurd, but impactful, and form the entire historical strategy of the Democratic Party beginning with their sycophantic obsession with enslaving blacks. Examining the use of similar language since the party's inception highlights the very real danger of such rhetoric, its purpose, designs, and means of application. Historically, this had led to civil war, lynching, and massive riots. Presently, we have had the riots, so what comes next?

With the growing sensationalism surrounding the civil disobedience on January 6th, 2021, it is worth highlighting the only actual insurrection in American history. Unlike present distortions, this insurrection was organized and plotted by a political organization and used violence, murder, and terror to place unelected party officials into positions of elected office. It was heavily predicated on white supremacy and anti-Republican hatred and serves as a useful foil to the present narrative that seeks to define political opposition as insurrectionary forces.

In my young life I refused to cross my heart or pledge allegiance to the flag. The reason for this was ignorance resulting from a weak public education system. Was this an error of youth, or is the flag truly unworthy of respect and honor?

Many arguments surrounding the construction of a border wall focus on emotional appeals of "fairness" or absurd, anthropomorphic fallacies that declare that a wall is "racist." Instead, the subject is addressed as it should be: in the context of natural rights theory and good government as it was defined and understood at the Founding.

The history of Haiti is often purified for modern consumption, omitting the abject poverty, tyranny, and yes even slavery that resulted from its revolutionary insurrection against France. These revolutionaries conducted a massive white genocide spanning over several years and changes in leadership, destroying their economy in the process. American is often maligned as the harbinger of Haiti's downfall; this is false.

The 1850 Slave Act, or Bloodhound Law, galvanized anti-slavery sentiment in the North and serves as the most grotesque abuse spearheaded by the Democratic slave-powers. This law forced states and citizens to act as Federal law enforcement to capture slaves, yet despite this apparent victory for te pro-slavery Democratic States, the application of Constitutional principles was maligned as violence against their prized institution and their citizens. The great Frederick Douglass highlighted the horrors of this act and the slave-power more generally by using the Founding and Framers as an effective foil, highlighting the deviation away from Founding principles by the party of Calhounism.

Kingsley is a unique specter in the sordid history of the Democratic Party slave-power. Unlike his contemporaries, Kingsley sought to breed blacks and whites to create a super-race of humans. He passionately argued for the creation of a slave-utopia, combining perverted elements of Aristotelian natural slavery, Platonic selective breeding, and Ottoman breeding & military usage of slaves.

Both dominant positions in modern ongoing disagreements concerning the Second Amendment and the constitutionality of firearms restrictions tend to ignore the deeply-rooted history and philosophy that predated the structure and intent of the Second Amendment. Critically, the Second Amendment was instituted as a solution to Congressional control of state militias, effectively creating a national army. The Second Amendment was a natural and logical extension of natural rights theory concerning the right to life, and with it, the right to defend and preserve that life. There was no discussion at the Founding or after about firearm restrictions and no notion that the Federal government should ever have the authority to do so.

In the modern discourse, stats are selectively chosen, and deceptive language adopted in order to push a false narrative maligning the United States as a country rife with violent crime and firearm homicides. None of the proposals being presented would rectify any of the presumed issues at play; perhaps most alarming, the restrictions being presented on rifles seek to apply 1968 handgun laws to rifles. However, an examination of all of the data surrounding firearms and their usage in the United States defeats the common narrative and highlights the absurdity of current proposals, beyond their anti-constitutional roots. This leaves one to question the motivation behind these laws if they would have no impact on firearm homicides and mass shootings. Potential answers are also explored in observance of the historical record, both within and without the United States.

Similar arguments are also presented on www.1787Project.com: https://www.1787project.com/post/the-danger-of-meme-argumentation

Useful TimeStamps:

4:00 - Purpose of 2nd Amendment to Balance Congressional/National Army

15:35 - Separation of "Militia" from "citizens" and "People"

24:00 - The Essentialism of Armed Citizenry to Healthy Governance

42:00 - History of Gun Confiscation in America

53:00 - 2A and Natural Rights

1:00:00 - Racist History of Gun Restrictions

1:11:00 - Contemporary Gun Restriction Debates & Misinformation

The governing philosophy of the Democratic Party in the Antebellum Era was Calhounism, the protection and expansion of slavery. One of the chief tenets of this argument was the Positive Good, insisting that slavery was the best possible means for slaves to live. A component of this was the influx of German philosophy and Babeufism through so-called "wage slavery" in free states. Democrats insisted that slavery was a superior system to free labor; did Engels, Babeuf, and others agree?

The story of the Spanish slave-trading vessel, Amistad, and the rescue of abducted Africans by an American slave-patrol is often overlooked or ignored. Why is this? A factual account brings honor to America and its Founders, but also illustrates what may be the earliest overt example of Democratic Party slave-expansionist political maneuvers.

In this Weekend Special, we travel from a historical focus on slavery to the modern day, addressing the resurrected monster of abortion in popular discourse. Many pro-abortion advocates cite the colinoal era, constitution, and Founding as indicators of a right to abortion, and even decry those who oppose abortion as white supremacists and racists. But what does history teach us, and how does this mix with natural rights theory and existing law? Let's explore this subject outside of moral or religious arguments and see if it can withstand a philosophical and historical examination.

Evidenced in previous episodes, the Democratic Party pursued slave-expansionism to the detriment and risk to the Union. Numerous small instances also occurred, including the violent assault of an anti-slavery statesmen in the Senate chambers, the burning of Federal postage, and the adoption of House rules to prohibit anti-slavery petitions.

A secret communication was made public that exposed previous and ongoing attempts by the slave-power Democrats to acquire new territory for slavery, first through purchase and then through manufactured crises and military invasion.