Pete Sampras vs. Roger Federer Wimbledon 2001

We have a new email where you guys can ask us questions, sportsre@kloka.org!

Transcript:

Pranav 0:01  

Hello and welcome back to sports reimagined. After our first exciting episode, we're back at it with another one. Get it? The DJ Khaled meme? Anyways, I'm your co-host Pranav.

Nitish 0:15  

And I'm your other co host Nitish.

Pranav 0:18  

So today's topic is What if Roger Federer had lost to Pete Sampras in the fourth round of Wimbledon in 2001. Let's begin with a bit of background.

Nitish 0:33  

Pete Sampras was a high flying great at Wimbledon, from 1993 to 2000. He won seven of eight Wimbledon's in that time, and this was known as the Pete Emperor's era.

Pranav 0:47  

Roger Federer, on the other hand, was a young up and coming player on grass. He had won the Wimbledon Junior Championship just three years prior, but after that, he wasn't able to make it past the fourth round of Wimbledon. You guys may be wondering, why is this match so important and why is it so important that Roger Federer lost?

Nitish 1:10  

The reason is, he gained confidence from this match, and manage maybe to become the greatest grass-court player of all time.

Pranav 1:26  

Pete Sampras, after this match, ended up retiring early. And this match, maybe could have been a contributing factor to that.

Nitish 1:36  

Anyways, let's get back into the match. 

Pranav 1:34  

The match started out with Roger Federer and Pete Sampras taking center court. It was Roger Federer's first time while Pete Sampras had played on center court many times. 

Nitish 1:34  

The game started out with Roger Federer winning the first set, seven, six, with his great serves and very good touch at the net. 

Pranav 1:34  

The second set however went to Pete Sampras, who won seven five, and made some great returns off the serve of Roger Federer, 

Nitish 1:34  

While also breaking Rogers serve to win the set. The next set belonged to Roger Federer, who dominated with his serve and volleys and also broke Pete Sampras, to win the set six four. 

Pranav 1:34  

The fourth set was won by Pete Sampras, seven, six, in the tiebreaker to set up a fifth set decider. 

Nitish 1:34  

And what a fifth set it was for Roger Federer, with whatever he was doing in that match working. He also finished and clinched the match with maybe one of the greatest returns of all time in Wimbledon history to win seven five in the last set in three hours and 41 minutes. 

Pranav 1:34  

Roger Federer in this last set managed to break Pete Sampras in the last game of the set, so he could win this match. This made it even more fun to watch. But the most important thing that Roger Federer gained from this match was mental strength and confidence. He now knew that if he tried his best, and worked hard, He could beat the best of the best.

Nitish 3:28  

And this match prove it to him. Not only did he stop his temper tantrums and his emotions. He did what was needed to win matches. And that was control.

Pranav 3:44  

Pete Sampras. After winning seven of eight Wimbledon's and just losing one in the semifinals. He was very sad. He had been such a great player on grass and losing to someone so young, and just the fourth round for him was very depressing.

Nitish 4:10  

After that, Pete Sampras took an early retirement in 2002. While Roger Federer won his first Grand Slam at Wimbledon in 2003, and went on to winning. eight Wimbledon titles in his career, up till this point.

Pranav 4:32  

This match also gave him competence to win on other courts, such as hard court, where he won five US opens, and six Australian opens, and even on clay, where he managed to win one French Open.

Nitish 4:52  

So now let's get to the part where Pete Sampras actually wins against Roger Federer.

Pranav 5:01  

So there's three possible timelines of what could have happened if Pete did manage to be Roger Federer in this match. So, the first timeline is that Pete is flustered by Roger taking him to five sets, and is unable to perform in the coming years. After realizing that such a young player took him to five sets. And he most likely would retire around the same time that he retired in the real world. And Federer still get some confidence from this match, and manages to become managers to continue to be great, like he is today.

Nitish 5:50  

This match solidified this, and I think even though he would have gotten heartbreak from not winning this match. Federer still must have gotten some confidence from pushing this match to five sets. The second timeline is Pete is confident and dominates Wimbledon for a good five to six years, but Federer still manages to play well in other tournaments, and after Pete leaves, still manages to get a good run in Wimbledon.

Pranav 6:18  

He obviously wouldn't be as great if Pete still continues to dominate for five to six years, but he would still have some sort of a great career winning at other opens and winning a couple of Wimbledons. So the third timeline is that Federer has no confidence, even though he took Sampras to five sets, which is very possible, because he was very hard on himself at the time, and he had a lot of temper tantrums. And Roger continues on to never being the great player he is today. He continues to be great on grass and dominates for some more time, instead of retiring at an early age. the next in this timeline, the aspiring players who modeled their game after Federer may not be in the same position today, An example of this is Felix Auger-Aliassime. His idol is Fedor so he may still have been a tennis player, but his game may never have been modeled after Roger Federer.

Nitish 7:29  

And, yeah, this next gen is really, really key to what will happen in the future. And I think really the game today will not be the same without Roger actually taking that step to beat Pete at Wimbledon, in 2001, in the fourth round.

Pranav 7:48  

Obviously this is just hypothetical. We have no idea what would actually happen if Pete Sampras had won this game, but we're just stating three possibilities here. And we think that these would be very much possible if he had won this match.

Nitish 8:04  

And again, we are going to stretch this a lot. Confidence is very important to a player's strength, and if they get the confidence needed, they can perform at a higher level, and if Roger Federer had actually been heartbroken, I don't think he would get the confidence needed to actually perform well on grass, or basically any other court at any moment.

Pranav 8:32  

So, we're gonna leave you with that today. If you enjoyed this episode, please be sure to follow our podcast. And watch out for the next episodes coming soon.

Nitish 8:51  

And also we do have an email, you can actually send us any questions to sports re@kloka.org That is sportsre@kloka.org Please, please ask us any questions on that email.

Pranav 9:09  

Until next time, see you later.