Russia is taking the gloves off in Ukraine, and the targets tell you more than the speeches do. We talk through what it means when a conflict expands from grinding down forces at the front to hitting the systems that keep a country running: bridges over the Dnipro, rail engines and warehouses, power distribution, and the pressure campaign that can empty a city before an assault. My guest, Larry Johnson, lays out why this shift signals acceleration, not stagnation, and why “retaliation” narratives miss the larger operational design.

From there, we zoom out to the flashpoints that could turn a regional war into a wider one. Kaliningrad is the kind of place pundits love to posture about, but it’s also the kind of place where deterrence and nuclear signaling are baked into the geography. We unpack the rhetoric coming out of NATO countries, Russia’s explicit warnings, and why misreading red lines in an exclave can create a crisis faster than anyone can walk it back.

We also tackle the uncomfortable ethical core that sits under modern warfare: proportionality, civilian risk, and the slippery slope into collective punishment. Then we pivot to the Middle East, Yemen’s shifting battlefield, and the real-world fuel behind geopolitics: a diesel shortage, export restrictions, Europe’s energy dependency, the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, and how all of it collides with US midterm politics and troop movement rumors.

If you want grounded, big-picture analysis on the Russia Ukraine war, Kaliningrad, energy security, and election-year foreign policy incentives, hit subscribe, share this with a friend, and leave a review with your biggest takeaway.

Chapter Markers

• 0:00 Cold Open And Florida Weather
• 2:15 Russia Escalates Strikes On Ukraine
• 7:40 Targeting Bridges Power And Logistics
• 14:35 What The Endgame Could Look Like
• 20:25 Kaliningrad Threats And Nuclear Warnings
• 23:35 Collective Punishment And War Morality
• 36:01 Yemen’s Battlefield And Diesel Shortage
• 48:31 Midterms Force Decisions In The Gulf
• 54:10 Final Thoughts And Tomorrow’s Guest

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Aircraft carriers, hypersonics, drone swarms, missile defense, and the messy reality of command all collide in this conversation with Bill Buppert, the Smedley Butler Fellow for Military Affairs at the Libertarian Institute and host of Chasing Ghosts. We start with how a military career can turn early idealism into realism, then follow Bill’s path from Navy intelligence to the Army, Special Forces intel work, and later contractor deployments in Afghanistan. That lived experience shapes a view that war is ruled by friction, failure, and what your organization can still do after the plan breaks.

From there, we get specific about what modern warfare is rewarding now: mission command, fast adaptation, and resilient systems that keep working when comms fail. Bill argues the US is stuck investing in exquisite platforms while underinvesting in the unglamorous basics that decide outcomes. We dig into Iran’s mosaic defense, anti-access area denial, and why mountainous terrain plus smart targeting can make conventional forces stumble. A key thread is the sensor-to-effector chain: if an adversary blinds radars, disrupts portable power, and forces you to burn through interceptors, your “best” weapons quickly become irrelevant.

We also go after sacred cows: the real cost and combat value of carriers, the risk of mission kills inside missile range, and the incentive system that promotes risk-averse leaders. If you care about US military reform, defense policy, and what Ukraine-era lessons mean for the next war, this one will challenge your assumptions. Subscribe for more, share this with a friend who thinks deterrence is automatic, and leave a review with your biggest takeaway: what should the US rebuild first?

Chapter Markers

• 0:00 Balance Of Power And A Warning
• 2:50 Meet Bill Bupert And His Work
• 6:05 A Navy Start And An Army Path
• 13:00 Iraq Intelligence Failures And Leaving
• 19:30 Patterns Behind US Military Mistakes
• 24:10 Mission Command And Why It Works
• 33:10 Russia, Logistics, And Learning Under Fire
• 38:55 Iran, A2AD, And America’s Weak Spots
• 45:10 Kill The Power And Blind The Radars
• 50:15 Bad Leadership Pipelines And Broken Incentives
• 56:00 Carriers, Amphibs, And Salvo Competition

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

He called it a “State of the Force” address, but what we heard sounded like a stress test for the entire US national security system. We walk through Pete Hegseth’s speech from the perspective of warfighting basics: readiness, doctrine, deterrence, and the leadership obligation to define intent and an end state before sending people into danger. After two decades of low-intensity conflict, the force isn’t just tired, it’s been shaped for the wrong kind of fight while near-peer adversaries watch, learn, and build counters.

We also dig into Project Meridian and the eyebrow-raising choice of big names like Elon Musk, Palmer Luckey, and Newt Gingrich as “best minds” to study the future of warfare. Tech matters, but war is not a demo day. We talk incentives, potential contracting concerns, and why real military reform has to be driven by doctrine, training realities, logistics, and brutal battlefield feedback, not political branding.

Then we hit the hardest line in the speech: labeling critical media coverage as “treason.” We explain why that rhetoric is un-American on its face, how it chills accountability, and why the press questioning strategy is not the same as attacking troops. If leaders want less pushback, the answer is transparency: clear objectives, honest costs, and constitutional process.

On the practical side, we break down why quantity is back, why industrial production still decides wars from Ukraine to Iran, and why cheap autonomous systems can beat “boutique” hardware. We close by revisiting Joe Kent’s points on Syria and the risk of an ISIS resurgence, plus a wag of the finger for anyone trying to guilt Americans into voting like politics is a team sport. If this conversation hits a nerve, subscribe, share the episode, and leave a review.

Chapter Markers

• 0:00 Welcome And What’s On Deck
• 2:35 The Force Is Worn Down
• 10:12 Project Meridian And Corruption Fears
• 14:07 Culture War Rhetoric Hits The Podium
• 19:48 Calling The Media Traitors
• 28:20 Quality Plus Quantity And The Industrial Base
• 33:39 Autonomous Warfare Command And Cheap Mass
• 40:10 What Accountability Should Look Like
• 43:15 Syria, Israel, And An ISIS Comeback
• 48:18 Wag Of The Finger On Voting Guilt
• 50:30 Tomorrow’s Guest And Closing

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

The US “leaves” Iraq again, the Red Sea stays tense, and a lot of people still can’t answer a basic question: who are the Houthis, really? We sit down with Joe Kent, one of the few guests who’s lived the Yemen problem up close, to unpack what most coverage skips: tribal power, terrain, coalition politics, and the very pragmatic incentives that shape Ansar Allah’s decisions. If you’ve been told they’re just an IRGC tool, we challenge that frame and explain what Zaidi identity, Sunni tribal alliances, and narrative control mean on the ground.

From there we connect the dots to the bigger regional map. We talk hybrid warfare, drones, ballistic missiles, air defense, and how geography turns the Bab al Mandab and the Red Sea into leverage. Then we shift to the US troop move from Iraq to Jordan, what it changes, what it doesn’t, and why Iraqi militias can still pull state levers even when Washington wants a clean exit.

Finally, we get blunt about the Iran war logic, the competing ceasefire proposals, and the Strait of Hormuz as an economic pressure point that hits voters fast. We also dig into why putting Marines on commercial tankers feels like a temporary fix with real escalation risk, and why Syria could become the next place chaos invites an ISIS comeback. If you want clearer analysis of Yemen, Iraq, Iran, Red Sea shipping, and Middle East escalation, hit play, subscribe, and share this with one person who follows the news. What part of this story do you think the public most misunderstands?

Chapter Markers

• 0:00 Why The Houthis Matter Now
• 1:22 Who The Houthis Really Are
• 10:05 Drones Missiles And Hybrid Warfare
• 14:40 Iran Ties Tribal Logic And Objectives
• 17:54 Leaving Iraq Without Really Leaving
• 23:20 Militias Inside Iraq’s Power Structure
• 29:44 Rubio’s Rationale And A Ceasefire
• 36:12 Hormuz Leverage And Political Pressure
• 43:26 Marines On Tankers Escalation Risks
• 46:35 Syria Israel And The ISIS Comeback
• 54:12 Wrap Up And What To Watch

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Five men get arrested near RAF Fairford, headlines scream “plot,” and then the suspects are released. That whiplash is exactly where we start, because it exposes the hardest part of intelligence-driven cases: the public wants evidence, but intelligence agencies cannot always show their work. With Alexander Mercouris joining us from the UK, we break down what people in Britain are actually hearing, why the media tone turns instantly skeptical when Iran is mentioned, and what that says about US-UK politics inside the Five Eyes relationship.

From there we move into something bigger than one base scare: the UK Terrorism Act 2000 and how terrorism charges are now being used around protest activity tied to Gaza and pro Palestine activism. Britain does not have a First Amendment, and that changes everything. We talk about how broad legal definitions can stretch, what happens when due process protections thin out, and why even courtroom advocacy is starting to feel riskier. If you care about free speech in the UK, Europe, and the United States, this part lands hard.

Then we shift east. Alexander shares takeaways from recent travel in Russia, including the calmer public mood he saw on the ground, and we connect that to the war in Ukraine: infrastructure attacks, economic pressure, and the strategic logic of isolating Kyiv from Western access. We close by linking Ukraine to the Middle East, Europe’s energy crunch, diesel vulnerability, and the fork-in-the-road question on Iran: negotiation and exit, or escalation and deeper entanglement. Subscribe, share the episode, and leave a review, then tell us what you think is driving the next turn in all of this.

Chapter Markers

• 0:00 The RAF Fairford Arrest Mystery
• 7:00 False Flag Fears And Intel Limits
• 12:20 Protesters Charged Under Terror Laws
• 17:40 Free Speech Crackdown And Politics
• 26:15 Trip To Russia And Public Mood
• 32:45 Russia’s View Of The West
• 43:55 Europe’s Energy Shock From Iran
• 50:25 The Next Six Months With Iran
• 57:10 Wrap Up And What’s Next

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

A cruise missile hits in the Gulf, Marines and sailors end up seriously wounded, and weeks later we’re still piecing together what actually happened. We work from first principles: what kind of vessel could take a strike and produce nearly 40 casualties, why a “civilian ship” explanation doesn’t square with the physics, and what it says about US force posture in contested waters. If the truth is being slow-walked, the bigger question is what else is being underreported and what that does to decision-making.

From there we widen the lens. We react to Marco Rubio’s blunt framing of national interest over “international order,” then connect it to the long unwind of post World War II rules, arms control expectations, and why other countries are actively distancing themselves from US leverage. Larry shares takeaways from his recent Russia trip, including candid conversations with senior Russian voices, the belief that a Europe war becomes likely under certain red lines, and why Russian planners now view US deterrence through a “Wizard of Oz” lens.

We close with the pressure points that can snap the system: Iran’s stated distrust of negotiations, missile activity around the Strait of Hormuz, the risk of preemptive strikes on concentrated targets, and a surprisingly under-discussed fuel problem. Diesel shortages, export incentives, and the Jones Act bottleneck aren’t abstract policy debates, they’re geopolitical accelerants. If this conversation sharpened how you see the map, subscribe, share it with a friend, and leave a review with your takeaway: what’s the single biggest risk you think Washington is misreading right now?

Chapter Markers

• 0:00 Welcome And Casualty Bombshell
• 6:45 What Ship Got Hit
• 13:10 Underreported Losses And Landstuhl Clues
• 19:40 Cuba Invasion Rumors Reality Check
• 24:30 Rubio And The Postwar Order Cracks
• 31:10 Russia Trip War With Europe Fears
• 41:20 Russia Judges US Military Readiness
• 46:10 Iran Rejects Talks Strait Escalation
• 50:55 Diesel Shortage Jones Act Fallout
• 53:55 Trump Threats And The Stakes

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Something feels off right now: lots of motion, lots of confidence, and not much steering. We sit down with Darryl Cooper, fresh off his latest deep dive on early 20th century history, to track how great powers stumble into wars they don’t fully understand until it’s too late. Starting with Britain after Queen Victoria, we talk about what happens when a once coherent power network fragments, policy turns reactive, and commitments on the continent start piling up in ways earlier leaders would have rejected.

From there we bring the lens home. We connect America’s post 1960s legitimacy crisis to the way modern governance can become a free for all, where organized interest groups capture parts of the state while no one is thinking in decades. We also dig into post Cold War choices, the abandoned hope of integrating Russia through cooperative frameworks, and why Ukraine, NATO, and credibility politics can function like tripwires that narrow options fast.

Then we get blunt about modern war. A near peer conflict is not a highlight reel, it’s an attrition equation: replacements, training time, industrial capacity, morale, and the level of trust people still have in institutions. Add drones and rapidly changing battlefield technology, and the comfort of recent precedents collapses. If you care about World War I history, geopolitics, American foreign policy, and the risks of great power conflict, this conversation is built to leave you thinking long after it ends. Subscribe, share this with a friend who argues politics with you, and leave a review with your take: what parallel worries you most right now?

Chapter Markers

• 0:00 Welcome Back And New Release
• 3:05 Britain After Victoria Loses Its Grip
• 10:40 America After The 1960s Loses A Helm
• 16:05 Foreign Policy By Interest Group Pressure
• 21:45 Attrition War And The Replacement Problem
• 28:00 Drones Change Everything In Combat
• 33:10 Morale And Trust Before Mobilization
• 41:00 Draft Politics In A Brittle Society
• 46:30 Weimar Germany And Post Soviet Russia
• 58:20 Tripwires From Poland To Ukraine NATO
• 1:02:30 Final Warnings And Wrap Up

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

“Do I annihilate the Islamic Republic?” That line doesn’t land like ordinary campaign bluster when it’s delivered from the UN podium. We take it seriously, because history shows that normalizing threats is how escalation becomes policy, and policy becomes catastrophe. I’m joined by Patrick Henningsen of 21st Century Wire, calling in live from the UK, to break down what Trump’s rhetoric signals about deterrence, international law, and the weakening of the post World War II order.

From there, we connect the dots the way the headlines usually won’t: how maximum pressure and sanctions can backfire inside Iran, how media narratives and atrocity propaganda shape consent, and why Gulf states may be far less “sovereign” than their wealth suggests. We talk Saudi Arabia’s bind, Yemen’s battlefield reality, and why the Houthis are often misunderstood as a simple proxy force when the military trend lines show something more serious.

We also dig into Israel’s expanding footprint in Latin America via the idea of “Isaac Accords,” the battle for diplomatic votes and capital markets, and why these moves matter for the wider US-Israel strategy. Then we end where every sober conversation eventually has to go: the renewed drumbeat around “low-yield” nuclear options, the B61 fear, nuclear proliferation, and the irreversible precedent of breaking the nuclear taboo.

If you want deeper, unfiltered analysis of the Iran war, Gulf security, Yemen, Israel in Latin America, and the nuclear escalation risk, hit play. Subscribe, share this with someone who still thinks “it can’t happen,” and leave a review with your biggest takeaway: what’s the most dangerous line we’ve already crossed?

Chapter Markers

• 0:00 Opening And What’s At Stake
• 1:21 Trump’s UN Threat Against Iran
• 9:51 How Maximum Pressure Backfires
• 19:59 Why Gulf States Cannot Break Free
• 23:24 Yemen’s War And Houthi Capabilities
• 40:04 Squeezing Saudi Arabia Into Compliance
• 43:24 Israel’s Isaac Accords And Latin America
• 48:54 The Nuclear Option And The Fallout
• 55:35 The Most Alarming Part Is Silence
• 59:53 Where To Find Patrick And Closing

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

A White House press pool isn’t a perk for friendly outlets. It’s one of the few mechanisms the public has to watch power up close, in real time, when decisions about money, corruption, and war are being made behind closed doors. We dig into the decision to push major publications out of the pool, why calling it “basic fairness” misses the point, and how quickly that logic turns into a loyalty test for journalists.

We also pull in the public mood around the war with Iran, including the moment a CNN reporter confronts the president at the UN while being blocked at home. When two-thirds of Americans say the US isn’t “winning,” controlling access doesn’t solve the underlying problem, it just makes the picture blurrier. We talk about what a free press is supposed to do: expose abuses, create space for dissent, and keep a marketplace of ideas alive so no single authority gets to declare what “reality” is.

Then we widen the lens with a historical warning. Britain’s run of peripheral conflicts before World War I created a dangerous confidence, and the Battle of Mons shows how fast a small, highly professional force can be chewed up by industrial attrition. We connect those lessons to today’s readiness math: long training pipelines, replacement limits, and adversaries with deeper manpower reserves. Alexander Mercouris was scheduled to join us and will be back next Tuesday, but the core question stays the same: what happens to a country when criticism gets punished and blind spots become policy?

If this conversation resonates, subscribe, share the episode with a friend, and leave a review so more people can find it. What’s the clearest sign that press freedom is being tested right now?

Chapter Markers

• 0:00 Why Press Freedom Matters
• 0:52 Checks And Balances Breakdown
• 1:58 Outlets Pushed Out Of Pool
• 2:23 JD Vance Defends The Ban
• 4:02 Why “Special Access” Is Misleading
• 6:10 Fox Pushback And The Constitution
• 8:12 What A Free Press Does
• 11:55 Founders On Knowledge And Power
• 16:24 Trump Confronts CNN At UN
• 18:05 Iran War Doubts And Parallels
• 19:35 How Perpetual War Gets Normalized
• 20:46 Pax Britannica And “Little Wars”
• 26:20 Mons And The Attrition Reality
• 30:45 Training Pipelines And Manpower Math
• 36:55 The Blind Spot And Closing

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

A triumphal arch at Arlington National Cemetery sounds like a history-book gesture, until you hear the pitch: reclassify it as “national security,” talk up drones and snipers, and treat a space built for remembrance as a hardened outpost. We walk through why that idea hits a nerve for veterans and civilians alike, how it distorts the symbolism of Arlington, and why a monument can become a form of domestic signaling when leaders want to look strong at home.

We also get practical about the legal plumbing. If you move land and authority to the Department of Defense, Title 10 opens doors: minor military construction, emergency construction, and the kind of “vital to national security” language that can sidestep normal review bodies and pressure Congress into playing catch-up. The details matter because precedent matters. Once “security” becomes the justification for anything, oversight becomes optional.

Then we turn to messaging and propaganda. We break down Pete Hegseth’s “Send Me Tour” and the use of Isaiah 6:8 as a war-forward slogan, why that reading strips the passage of context, and what it says about selling conflict as vocation. We close with two snapshots of the moment: Logan and Jake Paul at the Pentagon as a baffling PR move, and a delta wing drone pulled from the waters near Pensacola and the Eglin test range, raising real questions about where US drone technology stands in a rapidly changing world.

Subscribe for more, share this with someone who cares about civil-military boundaries, and leave a review with your take on the Arlington plan.

Chapter Markers

• 0:00 Welcome Back And Travel Notes
• 2:45 TSA Screening After Journalism Awards
• 4:05 Trump’s Arlington Arch Proposal
• 11:08 The Legal Loopholes Behind It
• 16:03 Pete Hegseth’s Bible War Rhetoric
• 25:02 Logan And Jake Paul At Pentagon
• 29:38 Delta Wing Drone Found Off Pensacola
• 32:37 Tomorrow’s Guest And Sign Off

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Free speech doesn’t usually get banned with a single law. It gets narrowed through platforms, pressure campaigns, legal threats, and a thousand small choices that teach creators and viewers what not to say. From the University Club in Chicago, we sit down with Russell Diebler and Keaton Weiss for a candid, off-the-cuff conversation about independent media, censorship, and what happens when the “alternative” becomes the new establishment.

We trace how The Daily Show helped pioneer the clip-and-contrast style that now dominates YouTube commentary, then ask where the next shift is coming from as Gen Z creators and short-form platforms change the rules again. Along the way, we wrestle with audience capture, the subtle trap where creators feel forced to keep serving the take that built their following. That kind of bottom-up self-censorship can be just as real as corporate media incentives, and it can hollow out independent journalism from the inside.

Then we get specific about the crackdown fears: whistleblower risk, legal pressure, deplatforming, and why Section 230 fights matter so much for online speech. We talk about the strange possibility that Americans could end up seeking freer speech on foreign-owned platforms, not because those systems are ideal, but because domestic power centers increasingly “manage” dissent.

We close with the hardest topic: representative government. If Congress keeps handing power to the executive, and voters stay distracted by culture-war noise and bot-driven outrage, what does self-government even mean anymore? Subscribe, share this with a friend who cares about the First Amendment, and leave a review with your take: what’s the biggest threat to free speech right now?

Chapter Markers

• 0:35 Live From Chicago Roadshow
• 4:20 From Jon Stewart To YouTube
• 11:38 The Coming Crackdown On Dissent
• 15:58 Section 230 And Platform Control
• 19:51 The First Amendment As A Choice
• 21:10 Congress Gives Away Its Power
• 24:31 Propaganda, Bots, And Division
• 27:25 Making Democracy Deliver Again
• 32:11 Final Thoughts And Sign Off

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

A satellite breaks apart, a few well-timed headlines hit, and suddenly “space weapons” stops sounding like a movie plot and starts sounding like policy. We sit down with Ron Dodson to unpack the Chinese satellite fragmentation story through the lens of OSINT, orbital mechanics, and what the debris field can and can’t prove. We talk retrograde orbits, why modern sensors shrink the world, and why a breakup that doesn’t fully vaporize the parent craft raises uncomfortable questions about intent, capability, and messaging.

From there we zoom out to the bigger shift: the collapse of the civilian vs military divide in satellite surveillance and commercial ISR. If a platform can support targeting, it becomes part of the battlefield, whether it’s branded as “remote sensing” or not. We also dig into escalation risk, Kessler syndrome, and the quiet nightmare scenario hiding in plain sight: GPS vulnerability and how dependent everything is on positioning, navigation, and timing, from aviation to shipping to the phone in your pocket.

Then we bring it back home. Red Sea disruption, Strait of Hormuz pressure, and oil chokepoints don’t stay “over there” for long. We connect the dots to inflation, diesel-driven supply chain costs, and why rate hikes and dollar demand still shape what you pay for gas, groceries, and mortgages. Ron also lays out a forward-looking view on housing market liquidity and the political volatility he expects as economic strain meets a chaotic election calendar.

If you care about geopolitics, space security, inflation, or how global shocks land in your daily budget, you’ll want to hear this one. Subscribe, share the show with a friend, and leave a review with your take: are we already in a space arms race, or is this still deterrence theater?

Chapter Markers

• 0:00 Space Weapons Enter The Headlines
• 3:05 Meet Ron Dodson And The Mystery
• 8:40 How Retrograde Orbits Change Surveillance
• 14:55 Debris Clues And What Did Not Happen
• 21:10 Directed Energy Or Simple Malfunction
• 27:35 Civilian Satellites Become Military Targets
• 33:10 GPS Vulnerability And Escalation Risks
• 39:40 Red Sea And Hormuz Shock The Economy
• 45:55 Rates, Dollars, Sanctions, And Inflation
• 53:05 Housing Liquidity And Political Volatility
• 58:20 Where To Follow Ron And Closing

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Gas prices don’t jump in a vacuum. When the world’s oil and shipping arteries get squeezed, the pain shows up in the most personal place possible: the pump. We start with a quick dose of real life, taking the kids to Princess Day at a ballpark, then pivot to a serious breakdown of why the Red Sea, Bab el-Mandeb, and the Strait of Hormuz suddenly feel like domestic issues for anyone who drives, ships, or buys groceries.

We walk through why the Houthis are not simply a push-button Iranian proxy and why underestimating a hardened militia leads to bad decisions. Using an analogy drawn from Appalachian history and the Battle of Kings Mountain, we talk about what happens when outside powers try to force submission on mountain communities that would rather die on their feet. That history frames the modern story of Yemen, including the long Saudi-led blockade, the humanitarian fallout, and the predictable blowback that follows years of civilian suffering.

From there, we connect the tactical to the economic: disciplined fighters, asymmetric warfare, and the reality that a dispersed militia can “melt away” and reappear when it suits them. We also dig into regional escalation and infrastructure vulnerability, including strikes that threaten Saudi export routes and the ripple effects across global energy markets. The result is a price shock that is easy to dismiss on cable news but impossible to ignore when diesel crosses $6, stations throttle purchases, and the cost of moving everything rises with it.

If you want a grounded, unsentimental look at Middle East geopolitics, energy security, and why there may be no clean military fix, hit play. Subscribe, share the episode with a friend, and leave a review with your take on what the US should do next.

Chapter Markers

• 0:00 Princess Day And Opening Banter
• 0:17 Straits Closed And Gas Spikes
• 1:32 Viral Houthi Video And Comparison
• 4:02 Kings Mountain And Mountain Defiance
• 7:48 Yemen Blockade And Humanitarian Toll
• 10:44 Discipline Footage And Field Tactics
• 12:13 Pipeline Strikes And Saudi Vulnerability
• 17:57 Oil Jumps And Diesel Sticker Shock
• 21:24 No Clean Military Fix
• 28:28 Photos Plus Guest And Chicago Plans

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Twenty five years after 9/11, the hardest question isn’t “what happened” but “what did we do with it.” We sit down with Scott Horton to follow the consequences that rarely make the highlight reel: how the War on Terror expanded, how the Iraq War got sold to the public, and why so many policymakers still can’t (or won’t) explain who won, who lost, and what it all changed.

We talk blowback in plain terms, including the way U.S. basing, interventions, and alliances shape motives for retaliation over time. Scott lays out the split between al-Qaeda and the Taliban, the decisions around Tora Bora, and the propaganda fog that helped merge unrelated enemies into one convenient villain. From there we track how Iraq empowered Iran, radicalized a new generation, and fed the later chaos in Syria, including the uneasy reality of jihadist groups rebranding as “political” actors.

We also confront the part people tiptoe around: how American support for Israel is cited again and again in extremist messaging and in the stated motives behind multiple attacks, including the Bourbon Street vehicle-ramming attack. None of this excuses violence; it’s about understanding cause and effect so we stop making the same security mistakes while pretending they’re surprises.

If you want a serious, detailed conversation about 9/11, the War on Terror, U.S. foreign policy, Iraq, Gaza, Iran, the Houthis, and why “each intervention necessitates the next one,” hit play. Subscribe, share this with someone who still has questions, and leave a review with the biggest lesson you think the country missed.

Chapter Markers

• 0:00 Twenty Five Years After 9/11
• 3:03 Why No One Learned The Details
• 8:16 Conflating Al Qaeda With Taliban
• 12:35 Iraq War Lies And Public Division
• 20:10 The Long Trail Of Blowback
• 28:01 Iraq Empowered Iran And ISIS
• 37:21 Clean Break And Chalabi’s Play
• 43:40 Gaza And The Blank Check Problem
• 54:48 Bourbon Street And Modern Blowback
• 1:03:14 The Only Exit Is To Quit
• 1:05:35 Jolani In A Suit In Syria
• 1:10:22 Houthis, Iran, And Failing Bases
• 1:14:31 Final Thoughts And Sign Off

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Defense procurement is one of those topics people think will be boring until they realize it decides who gets the right gear in time and who doesn’t. We get blunt about what’s broken in the defense acquisition process, from outright corruption to the quieter kind of capture that happens when lobbying, PAC money, and “market for access” behavior becomes normal. If you’ve ever wondered why the Pentagon can spend enormous sums and still struggle with speed, stockpiles, and mission readiness, we connect the dots in plain language.

We walk through concrete examples that show the difference between street-level graft and structural influence. That includes the Fat Leonard scandal and why it’s a textbook case of procurement capture, plus a look at a major 2024 settlement involving defective pricing and bribery allegations. Then we turn to the biggest symbol of acquisition dysfunction: the F-35 program, its readiness rates, and the idea of sustainment lock-in where proprietary data and contractor-controlled logistics make the government a captive customer for decades.

After that, Eric Jennings (host of the World XP podcast) joins us from inside the DoD acquisitions world to explain why requirements take so long, how DFARS-driven compliance stacks up, and why risk aversion can freeze decision making. We also get practical about solutions: empowering decisions lower in the chain, cutting dead time in review queues, using SBIR and faster contracting vehicles, and being honest about when commercial off-the-shelf gear helps and when ruggedization and sustainment realities bite back.

If you care about defense contracting reform, Pentagon procurement, and getting capability to the field faster without sacrificing safety, hit play. Subscribe, share this with someone who follows national security, and leave a review with the one change you’d make first.

Chapter Markers

• 0:00 Why Procurement Shapes National Power
• 1:30 Why Gear Arrives Late
• 3:10 Street-Level Corruption And Kickbacks
• 4:45 Fat Leonard And Procurement Capture
• 5:40 Raytheon Case And Weapon Shortages
• 6:51 Lobbying And Structural Influence
• 8:34 The F-35 Sustainment Lock-In
• 12:55 Eric Jennings On Requirements Bottlenecks
• 18:40 Speed Versus Safety In Fielding
• 26:27 How Fast Can Anything Ship
• 33:51 Adapting Faster Than Competitors
• 41:04 SBIR And Commercial Off The Shelf
• 49:20 When Process Becomes The Product
• 52:04 Premier League Picks And Closing

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Twenty-five years after 9/11, the story we were handed still fights the facts. We bring back Matt Hoh, Marine veteran and former State Department official, to rewind the clock to the morning of the attacks and then follow the chain reaction through the Global War on Terror, the Iraq War, and the long hangover many GWOT veterans carry today. If you’ve ever wondered how a “temporary” mission becomes a generation-spanning conflict, this conversation puts real dates, real decisions, and real consequences on the table.

We start with where we were on September 11 and how the country processed fear before social media, then shift into what Matt saw from inside the Pentagon and later inside Iraq’s occupation apparatus. He breaks down the Coalition Provisional Authority mindset, the deep ignorance baked into many policies, and how reconstruction and “money as a weapon system” can quickly become a pipeline for corruption, militia power, and more violence. We also dig into debaathification, sectarian dynamics, and why “spreading democracy” rhetoric collapses when it hits local politics and human reality.

From Anbar Province to the Sunni Awakening and the later rise of ISIS, Matt connects tactical turning points to strategic failure, then brings it forward to the present: moral injury, the feeling of betrayal, and the growing risk of blowback as the US stays entangled in Middle East conflicts, including Gaza and rising tensions with Iran. We close on the hard question: how do we reverse this? Matt’s answer is blunt about political costs, media narratives, and why independent voices matter.

If this hit a nerve, subscribe, share the episode, and leave a review. What do you think actually reduces blowback and prevents the next forever war?

Chapter Markers

• 0:06 Time Catches Up Fast
• 1:57 Finding Matt Ho’s Starting Point
• 2:53 9/11 Inside A Breacher Course
• 5:51 A Freshman’s View Of National Shock
• 10:26 From Okinawa To The Pentagon
• 15:02 Iraq Reconstruction Meets Cash And Militias
• 17:50 Debaathification And Occupation Ignorance
• 26:06 The Anbar Awakening And Sudden Quiet
• 31:54 Veteran Betrayal And Broken Narratives
• 38:21 Exceptionalism Versus Strategic Empathy
• 49:32 Blowback From Gaza To Iran
• 55:15 Making War Politically Expensive
• 58:08 Closing Thanks And Subscribe Ask

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

The Persian Gulf isn’t a chessboard, it’s a map with consequences, and we keep acting like geography doesn’t matter. Col. Douglas MacGregor joins us to connect a brutal Civil War lesson from Fredericksburg to today’s Strait of Hormuz reality: Iran sits close, mobilized, and treats this as existential, while the United States signals strength with forces that can be pushed offshore by drones and missiles.

We get into what a “blockade” really means when logistics are stretched, oil prices jump, and the Strategic Petroleum Reserve is no longer the backstop people assume. From there, we zoom out to the political layer: why Congress so often follows the same donors across party lines, why a mass casualty event might trigger “why are we there?” instead of a rush to war, and how the growing people versus state divide in Europe could foreshadow turbulence in the United States.

Then we tackle leadership and modernization: perverse incentives in the senior ranks, too many cooks at the top, and why the US military talks about experimentation but too often rigs the outcome. Doug also argues that Iran and Russia are civilizational states that fight differently when they believe survival is on the line, and that misunderstanding that mindset leads to disasters we could have predicted.

If you found this useful, subscribe, share the episode with a friend, and leave a review so more people can find it. What do you think is the hardest truth Washington is refusing to face right now?

Chapter Markers

• 0:00 Labor Day Return And Guest Setup
• 2:50 Fredericksburg Lessons For Modern War
• 5:00 Iran’s Geographic Advantage In The Gulf
• 14:20 Mass Casualties And Congress Incentives
• 18:30 The Growing Divide Between People And State
• 23:20 Empire Thinking And The Petrodollar Bargain
• 27:30 Drones Missiles And A Navy Pushed Offshore
• 30:40 Why Military Experimentation Keeps Failing
• 32:00 Senior Leader Turnover And Broken Incentives
• 40:40 Total War Mindsets In Iran And Russia
• 46:10 Civilizational Blind Spots And Unsustainable War
• 50:30 Reexamining Strategy And Final Takeaways

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

The fastest way to misunderstand the Iran crisis is to treat it like a series of isolated strikes. We look at how retaliation, shipping risk, and market psychology combine into one escalating system where the Strait of Hormuz becomes the pressure point for the global economy and US domestic prices. When missiles fly and officials insist everything is “under control,” the real test shows up in oil, insurance, diesel, and aviation fuel and it can hit your wallet long before any policy admits failure.

Larry Johnson joins us to dig into the strategy problem underneath the headlines: if Iran can still strike regional targets and threaten bases, what does “winning” even mean? We talk timing, CENTCOM posture, and why bravado can backfire when markets open and confidence drops. From helium and computer chip supply to fertilizer inputs and disrupted grain flows, we connect energy security to the risk of broader shortages and even a future global food crisis. We also confront America’s growing debt burden and why it limits resilience when the next shock arrives.

Then we turn to the information war. Paid influencers, media narratives, and official talking points don’t land the way they used to and that’s both a warning and an opportunity. We unpack what critical thinking looks like when claims about mines, shipping lanes, and “open straits” clash with events on the ground. Finally, we hit the Pentagon side: leadership churn, rumors about the next Secretary of the Army, donor influence, and why mixing the military with politics corrodes trust fast.

If you want more episodes that connect geopolitics, national security, and real-world economic consequences, subscribe, share this with a friend, and leave a review. What part of this story do you think people are still missing?

Chapter Markers

• 0:08 Middle East Flashpoints And Pentagon Chaos
• 1:36 Why Moscow Dialogue Still Matters
• 3:33 America And Russia See Power Differently
• 7:33 Sanctions Absurdity And What Teams Teach
• 13:20 Iran Escalation Meets Market Reality
• 18:58 Hormuz Chokepoint And Fuel Shortages
• 27:12 Helium, Fertilizer, Wheat And Debt Warnings
• 31:58 Mines, Media Claims, And Gulf Reality
• 38:24 Paid Influencers And Modern Propaganda
• 44:04 Army Leadership Rumors And Donor Power
• 47:28 The Military And Politics Don’t Mix
• 52:29 “Mowing The Lawn” And The Road Ahead

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

They told him his life’s work was worth $3,000 a book, and he says they took it first. Peter Maguire joins me to lay out why he refused a settlement tied to Anthropic’s alleged copying of hundreds of thousands of copyrighted books for AI training, including three of his own. We get specific about what’s being copied, how authors discovered it, and why “AI training” can look a lot like intellectual grand larceny when the money flows one way and creators are left with scraps.

From there, the conversation expands into how power works now: platform monopolies, automated enforcement, and the modern reality of deplatforming. Peter walks through his experience with Meta, including being knocked offline with devastating accusations and getting no clear path to a real human appeal. We connect those experiences to a wider breakdown in trust, the revolving door between government and Silicon Valley, and the way Big Tech can quietly shape what you can find, share, and even think you’re allowed to question.

We also hit the cultural side of the AI boom: data centers, surveillance anxiety, and the false promise that everything important can be measured. Whether it’s war, writing, or a fight camp, the human element matters, and metrics miss the part that counts when pressure hits. If you care about free speech, copyright, creative work, and who gets to set the rules for the next era of technology, this one is for you. Subscribe, share this with a friend, and leave a review with your take: should AI companies have to pay creators up front?

Chapter Markers

• 0:00 Why AI Feels Like A Threat
• 1:18 Meet Peter McGuire
• 2:29 Anthropic’s Alleged Book Theft
• 6:05 Refusing The $3,000 Per Book Deal
• 9:46 The 2001 Case That Put Him On Lists
• 13:05 Surveillance And Travel Hassles
• 19:57 Meta Deplatforming And False Accusations
• 26:32 Tech Oligarchs And A Cultural Recalibration
• 31:56 War Rules Torture And Blowback
• 39:12 Noble Lies Data Centers And Control
• 48:18 Trust Breakdown In Elections And Tech
• 53:58 Why Humans Resist Being Quantified
• 58:26 AI Valuations The Bubble And Collapse
• 1:00:08 Where To Follow Peter And Closing

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Tactical nukes shouldn’t show up in a PowerPoint like they’re just another tool, but that’s where the conversation has drifted and it tells us something ugly about the moment we’re living in. We sit down with Buck Johnson of Counterflow to unpack the fast-moving Iran conflict, the whiplash of headline-driven escalation, and the creeping sense that America is sleepwalking into choices most citizens never imagined would be on the table.

We dig into the arc of the war and why “we’re stuck” can be the most honest summary: bad assumptions, contested intelligence, and leaders trying to save face after promising quick outcomes. From there, we zoom out to the constitutional crisis underneath it all: Congress losing its war powers, the executive branch acting as the permanent engine of conflict, and what that does to the republic over time. If you care about the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, natural law, and the long-term cost of the military-industrial complex, this conversation stays grounded in those stakes.

Then we go where most geopolitics talk never goes: the moral and spiritual roots of all of it. Buck connects nuclear rhetoric, cultural decline, and the “Acknowledge Me” validation economy, arguing that a society trained on immediate gratification struggles to practice restraint, sacrifice, or humility. We talk Orthodox Christianity, fasting, self-denial, real leadership, and why refusing to put faith in princes might be the first step toward rebuilding a healthier center of gravity.

If this challenged you, subscribe, share it with a friend, and leave a review with the one takeaway you don’t want to forget.

Chapter Markers

• 0:00 Hard Questions To Start
• 2:11 Iran Escalation And War Confusion
• 7:20 Bad Intel And No Exit Plan
• 10:12 Faith Over Ideology In Politics
• 15:49 Tactical Nukes Enter The Conversation
• 24:20 Who Refuses An Unjust Order
• 30:31 Leadership Decline And Idiocracy Fears
• 31:48 The Acknowledge Me Culture
• 38:52 Discipline Through Training And Sacrifice
• 43:02 From Atheism To Orthodox Christianity
• 51:03 Tradition, Home, And Faith Practices
• 55:46 Burning Ego Away To Rebuild Culture
• 59:11 Where To Follow Buck

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy